I have gotten into a lot of trouble with The Church and with conservatives with my position on transsexuals -- sympathetic!
Transsexuals aren't just "perverts" who made bad choices, or adults who used to be children whose minds were bent by sexually- or physically-abusive parents.
Read their autobiographies. Something simple clearly goes "kablooey" in their mother's womb which results in irreversibly-imprinted psycho-sexual misdevelopment, so that the newborn's self-perceived gender is in a state of permanent total war with the physical reality -- a kind of physical male permanently-and-unchangeably "glued" to physiologically-based female orientation in psychology, or a kind of physical female permanently-and-unchangeably "glued" to a physiologically-based male orientation in psychology. The permanent state of internal mental and emotional rebellion and war is utterly exhausting. Their personal perception -- and the objectively best description -- of what is going on is that they are a man trapped in a woman's body or a woman trapped in a man's body.
"A good whuppin'" won't straighten things out.
Disciplined Christian thinking won't straighten thing out.
To its eternal credit, the Roman Catholic Church has taken the enlightened position on applications for "sexual reassignment." After careful review to protect against self-deception by Catholics standing in line for reassignment surgery, the Church will indeed advise Catholic victims of the transsexual dysfunction, in appropriate circumstances, that sexual reassignment is moral.
The logic of the approval is ultimately essentially the same as the logic of the Pauline Privilege Divorce or the Petrine Privilege Divorce in Catholic Christianity (approved by Paul and Peter, respectively) -- personal spiritual peace with God must prevail.
Christians who deny the existence of naturally-occurring sexual deviation, because of deeply-seated desire to "keep sex and sexual morality simple," will be outraged at that position, but I nonetheless have concluded that it is the moral one.
The Catholic Church's position also makes theological sense. The stain of Original sin not only corrupts man, but also nature itself. Thus, one would expect the physiological basis for sexual self identification to be dysfunctionally corrupted at least some of the time.
Also, note well, Christian, note well: Gays want their psycho-sexual divergence ratified, so that they remain unlike "heteros." On the other hand, in essence, honest transsexuals want their state of divergence cured.
To the best of my knowledge, there is a moral duty of celibacy after sexual reassignment -- those reassigned to become males don't as a result of reassignment suddenly have a moral right to "boink" a beloved female; those reassigned to become females don't as a result of reassignment suddenly have a moral right to be "boinked" by an interested male.
But, the Church actually recognizes a moral right to reassignment itself, for the sake of a peaceful relationship with God.
The Church's position, therefore, tends to outrage everyone -- so-called "liberals" and so-called "conservatives."
HOWEVER ...
There is a reason why I say "so-called" in referring to "liberals."
Historically, and also in politics today, so-called "liberals" -- including a lot of liberals in the Catholic clergy -- have an extremely strong tendency to "go Nazi."
And so, for years, I have been saying that "a substantial percentage of liberals are really Nazis. They think that they are 'enlightened,' but they aren't. Many are just a not-very-distinct variety of really stupid Nazi." I noticed the extremely strong comparison between the "liberals" of the French Revolution and the Nazis of Nazi Germany when I was earning my degree in Politics at St. Joe's University in the 1970s.
On the subject of transsexuality, look at what super-liberal Obama and his liberal friends are trying to do as I write this ...
At first, when I heard about the Obama Adminstration's efforts to open bathrooms to transsexuals, I stupidly thought, "Huh! That's interesting!," because I foolishly believed that the Obama Administration was somehow working for the rights of transsexuals that have already had reassignment surgery.
Oh, how stupid I was! In fact, the gravamen of the federal effort is to entitle people who haven't had reassignment surgery to go into the bathrooms not conforming to their physical gender.
Let me put it to you this way ...
In effect, as far as I know -- though the Obama Administration and lying liberals would hem-and-haw on this restatement of their position to try to lie their way out of a difficulty presented by their idiot position -- the Obama Administration wants to entitle full grown, hairy, heavily-muscled transsexuals with penises and with big sweaty scrotums carrying big testicles, who haven't had reassignment surgery, to join your little daughters in the ladies' rooms during intermission at the public school musicals.
Remember those Nazi propaganda posters portraying fictional fat, hairy Jewish men victimizing helpless blonde Gentile girls? In effect, the Obama Administration is trying to actually achieve an equivalent result using transsexuals instead of fictional Jews, in public bathrooms!
As far as I can see, that is exactly why a growing number of states are viewing "liberal" Democrats as really stupid, misguided, vile Nazis!
My wife and I used to babysit a wonderful, gentle little girl, years ago, who because she was this little tiny, innocent, gentle kindred spirit, I kind of mentally and emotionally "daughterized."
I used to take her to museums during babysitting sessions -- the usual for our area, the Franklin Institute, the Academy of Natural Sciences, and the University of Pennsylvania Museum, my "second home."
At the U of P Museum, as we were leaving on the ground floor the little girl said, "I have to use the facilities before we go."
The upper floors were already closed, so we were stuck with the rest rooms on the ground floor.
There was one problem -- the Ladies Room at the U of P on that floor was being renovated.
To solve this problem for the little girl, I (1) left the little girl with a security guard a few feet from the Mens Room door; (2) called into the Mens Room; (3) received no answer; (4) went in, and saw that there were no other people there; (5) checked the stalls to make sure that all toilets there were "squeaky clean," (6) wiped-down the toilet farthest from the door -- the least used one, presumably -- with ammonia cleaner which I had brought in our back-pack with rags (because MRSA was big, then), and then, after having the security guard temporarily ban use of the rest room to any males, I told the little girl that we would allow no men into the bathroom while she was in there, and shout into the bathroom every half-minute or so so that she did not have abandonment worries in a strange place.
During her use of a toilet, a man tried to get in, but I and the security guard barred him, and he understood when I explained the situation to him.
A woman insisted on going in, and reassured the little girl by name, on advice by me, when she did.
Under the rule changes which Herr Super Liberal Obama is dictatorially shoving down the nation's throat, a 6'4" heavily-muscled transsexual with hairy arms and legs and a big penis and testicles hanging down between his legs would, under the temporary reassignment of the rest room to use by women, only, as far as my JD allows me to see, have a full federal right to push past the security guard and me, with his size, his smells, his big male genitals, his loud coughing and throat clearing, and go in and pee into a toilet right next to the little girl's stall, scaring the living daylights out of that little girl, sitting helplessly on a toilet with her pants and panties down at her ankles, because in the transsexual's mind the transsexual is a woman.
Sorry, "liberals." That's "over the edge," for me. President Obama and the "liberal" Democrats who blindly support him are dead wrong this time. They are "being Nazi" toward America's most precious gift from God -- because, well, hey!, "liberals" know better than God, right?
So, you lose.
No comments:
Post a Comment